国家治理中的派系问题研究——一个西方政治思想史的简述  

Faction in State Governance:A Simple Description in History of Political Thoughts

作　　者：岳成浩[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学政府管理学院,江苏南京210093 [2]西北大学公共管理学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第1期82-88,共7页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(07BZZ007)

摘　　要：国家治理的一个根本目的是追求稳定,然而,无原则的派系乱斗从古至今一直是困扰国家治理的一个顽疾。从古希腊、古罗马到中世纪的城市共和国,再到近代民主的产生与发展,无不闪现着派系的身影及其对政治秩序的冲击和破坏。派系问题由此激起了不同时代政治思想家的思考,人们就派系的危害、表现形式、产生原因以及抑制方式等提出不同的看法,并认为对公共利益的背离与危害是判定派系行为的根本标准。从政治思想史来看,休谟和伯克对派系问题的思考成为一个转折,休谟不但对派系进行了类型学的分析,而且注意到了派系的现代形式,伯克则从规范的意义上首次对派系与政党作出了有效的区分,从而为现代国家治理中政党政治的出现提供了一种合理的理由。Stability is an important goal for state governance, however, factions＇ fights without principles is a dis- ease for state＇s governance in all ages. Factions appear in archaic Greece and Rome, and mediaeval city -states, even modern democracies, of course, they cause political turbulence. So people in any time think and reflect the faction problem, they talk and analyze the harm, form, reason of faction, including how to control it, they use pub- lic interests to measure and identify the faction. David Hume and Edmund Burke~ probing faction problem should be seen as milestone in political thoughts history, because Hume not only classifies the faction but also analyzes modern faction; Burke distinguishes the faction and party in normal meaning, and gives a reason for party politics in state governance.

关 键 词：国家派系 公共利益 政治思想史 

分 类 号：D091[政治法律—政治学]