检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨学宾[1] 晋欣桥[1] 杜志敏[1] 祝用华[1] 范波[1] 方兴[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学制冷与低温工程研究所,上海200240
出 处:《土木建筑与环境工程》2013年第1期153-158,共6页Journal of Civil,Architectural & Environment Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(50976066);国家自然科学青年基金(51006066)
摘 要:提出了空调系统运行性能ELECTRE评价模型。性能评价准则考虑了运行能耗、热舒适性PMV和PPD、室内空气品质指标CO2浓度和TVOC浓度等5个指标。在TRNSYS(Transient system)空调系统仿真平台上,以7种不同运行工况为例,对空调系统运行性能进行多属性优劣排序。采用3种不同权重方案分别计算各方案的级别优先得分。结果表明,评价模型能够对不同运行工况下的性能进行多属性优劣排序,以选择出最优方案。不同的权重赋值对研究中的性能优劣排序结果影响不大。以后的研究应考虑诸如控制系统执行性能等更多指标的空调系统运行性能综合评价。An ELECTRE performance evaluation model was developed to outrank the different operating conditions of air conditioning systems. Five evaluation criteria covers total energy consumption, thermal comfort PMV and PPD, indoor air quality indices such as CO2 concentration and TVOC concentration. The performance under seven different operating conditions was outranked on the TRNSYS (transient system) simulation platform. Three assignment alternatives of weight coefficients were selected to calculate the relevant credibility scores respectively. The results indicate that the proposed evaluation model can outrank the different operating conditions and select the optimum one, Moreover different weight assignments have little influence on the outranking scores. Further investigation should focus on the more evaluating criteria such as control performance and others in the comprehensive evaluation of operating conditions.
关 键 词:空调系统 评价 多属性 优劣排序 ELECTRE 运行性能
分 类 号:TU831.3[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42