检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京军区总医院医务部,100700
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2013年第3期58-61,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的研究具有一定科研经历的临床护士对科研诚信认识及科研规范的了解状况,以期为护理科研诚信管理提供相关依据。方法便利抽取13所三甲医院296名工作年限I〉5年且发表过护理论文的临床护士,采用自设问卷进行调查。结果64.0%以上的临床护士对他人不负责任的科研行为都表示“不太合适”或“不合适”:如64.5%的临床护士不赞同“研究者向他人提及研究对象情况”,97.0%的临床护士不认同在研究成果报道中加水分。然而临床护士对科研相关规范的了解程度不容乐观:如临床护士对“投稿规范”和“科研数据收集、保存与使用的相关规范”表示“比较了解”或“非常了解”分别为56.1%和20.6%。结论基于临床护士对科研诚信的正确认识和积极态度,应加强护理科研诚信管理,可通过加强对科研规范方面的宣传和教育,逐步提升其被知晓度,健全科研管理制度,增加对护理科研的支持力度,促进护理科研诚信。Objective To study the cognition of scientific research integrity and know status of scientific research standard of nurses who had research experience so as to provide some evidence for nursing research integrity management. Methods A total of 296 nurses whose working years was more than 5 years and who had delivered scientific research papers in 13 Grade A hospitals from 7 cities were investigated by self-designed questionnaires. Results More than 64.0% nurses showed not appropriate or inappro-priate for those irresponsible research behavior: 64.5% nurses did not agree with the researchers to referring the research object situation for others, 97.0% nurses believed the research achievement should be ob- jective. While nurses did not know the research standards well: only 56.1% nurses knew the standard of sub- mitting manuscript, and 20.6% nurses knew research data collection, preservation and usage. Conclusions It is necessary to enhance the management of nursing research integrity through education and propaganda of the research standards, improving the scientific management system, increasing the research support for nurse scientific so as to promote the nursing research integrity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28