冲突与衡平——基于《侵权责任法》第56条的分析  

Conflict and Balance-A analysis based on the 56th of tort liability law

作　　者：杨敏 梅文华 

机构地区：[1]珠海人民医院,广东珠海519000

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2013年第2期127-130,共4页Chinese Health Service Management

基　　金：四川大学国家人文社科重大攻关项目培育计划课题"现代医疗技术中的生命伦理及法律问题研究"的阶段性成果(编号:sczd201118)

摘　　要：通常患方的知情同意是医疗机构实施救治措施的前提条件,在危及生命时,面对患者知情同意权与医疗机构抢救权的冲突,《侵权责任法》第56条赋予了医疗机构越过患者知情同意权而实施救治的特殊干预权。无论是从伦理角度抑或是法学视角,第56条都有其合理性和正当性,但在实际运用中可能会产生种种冲突。本文在侧重分析实然状态下社会大众可能产生的冲突基础上提出了明确权利位阶,强制缔约,强制履约与国家补偿等衡平的路径。Usually the patients＇informed consent was the precondition of medical institutions＇treatment measures. When the lives of patients were being threatened and the conflicts between patients＇ right of informed consent and saving right of medical in- stitutions accrued, the 56 th of tort liability law entitles medical institutions the right of special intervention, ignoring the patients＇ right of informed consent. The 56th has rationality and legitimacy on the sides of ethic and law,but many conflicts will be found in the practical app/ication. The paper gives the methods to balance such as clearing the right order, forcing contracts, forcing per- formance and state aid, on the basis of selectively analyzing the conflicts of mass society probably happening in actual state.

关 键 词：知情同意权 特殊干预权 正当行为 冲突 衡平 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]