从“黑天鹅商标案”看商标权非法转让救济方式的缺失  

Absence of the Remedies of Illegal Assignment of Trademark Right from “Black Swan” Trademark Case

作　　者：曾旻辉[1,2] 郑友德[3] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学公共管理学院 [2]广东华进律师事务所 [3]华中科技大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第2期39-43,共5页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(我国清洁能源产业的绿色知识产权战略研究;项目编号71173080);国家社科基金重点项目(面向自主创新能力建设的国家知识产权政策体系研究;项目编号12azd031)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：现今社会,商标作为商品或服务标识的重要性越来越被企业所认识,截至2010年底,我国商标注册累计申请量、累计注册量和有效注册量均居世界第一位;然随之而来的是商标权非法转让纠纷与日俱增。为更好地维护商标权人及相关方的利益,应尽快明确建立商标权非法转让救济体系。具体来说,可从强化商标局审查职能及在立法层面确定救济途径等方面来尝试。In today＇s society, the importance of trademark as a commodity or service marks is more and more recognized by the enterprises. As of the end of 2010, the accumulative trademark applications, trademark registrations and valid trademark registrations in China occupied the first place in the world, while the illegal assignment disputes of trademark right have been increasing. In order to better protect the interests of the owners of trademark and the related parties, the remedy system of illegal assignment of trademark rights should be established as soon as possible. Specifically, it is suggested to strengthen the CTMO＇s examination functions and stipulate the remedies at the legislative level.

关 键 词：商标权 非法转让 救济方式 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]