两种坐骨结节囊肿手术方式的比较  

A comparison of two opproaches of ischial tuberosity cyst surgery

作　　者：刘湘国 陈金辉 刘斌 

机构地区：[1]长沙市八医院普外科,湖南长沙410100

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2013年第7期24-25,共2页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较两种不同手术方式治疗坐骨结节囊肿。方法收集传统法(31例)和破囊法(24例)手术病例,进行回顾性分析,比较手术创伤、术后并发症发生情况。结果两组病例在切口大小、手术时间、术中出血、术后切口感染渗液发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组均无复发病例。结论破囊法手术操作更简单,创伤小,术后并发症发生率更低,具有优势。Objective To compare the advantages and shortcomings of two different routes of ischial tuberosity cyst surgery. Methods Thirty-one cases of the traditional surgical method, and 24 cases of the broken capsule method were collected. The surgical trauma and complications after operation were analyzed and compared retrospectively. Results Two groups of patients in the incision size, operating time, blood loss, postoperative wound infection rates were significantly different （P 〈 0.05）. There were no recurrent cases. Conclusion The broken capsule method is more simple surgical procedure, with less trauma and lower postoperative complication rate, with the advantage.

关 键 词：坐骨结节囊肿 手术方式 比较 并发症 

分 类 号：R686.7[医药卫生—骨科学]