检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李昊[1]
出 处:《中国管理科学》2013年第1期23-30,共8页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(12CGL017)
摘 要:传统的开放式基金评级方法存在两个缺陷,首先是忽视了现实中投资者是如何做决策的,假定投资者对利益和损失的主观态度相同;其次是忽略了现实的样本性质,假定随机收益的样本达到渐近正态的规模。通过期望效用的高阶泰勒序列展开建立超额收益的高阶矩和效用函数的关系,以高阶矩为约束条件估计样本的经验概率,再对经验概率进行决策权重调整。在此基础上,通过扩展夏普比和应用随机占优准则进行基金评级,并对645种开放式基金进行了案例分析。There are two methodological flaws in conventional approach on ranking mutual fund. First, the real way of the investor making decision is neglected and it is assumed that the investor has the same aptitude on gain and loss. Second, the properties of empirical sample are ignored and it is assumed that the sample of stochastic returns reaches the size of asymptotic normality population. Based on expectation utility theory, the excess returns are e excess returns and utility function. estimated from sample and adjuste xpanded by high order Taylor series to link the high order moments of Using higher order moments as constraints, the empirical probability is d by decision weight. Based on empirical probability decision adjustment, mutual funds are ranked by Sharpe ratio expansion and stochastic dominance criterion. As a case study, 645 mutual funds are rated with this two indicators.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.14.81