检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李竺芸[1]
出 处:《广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第1期146-150,共5页Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:在合同解除制度中,合同解除的效力问题关系到解除后一系列权利义务的行使、纠纷的解决问题。在我国,合同解除的效力问题主要规定于《合同法》第97条和98条,在解释论上对于怎样解释与运用合同解除的效力也有诸多争议。本文对于合同解除效力是否存在溯及力、解除后义务履行、结算清理条款的适用、合同解除后恢复原状性质、损害赔偿与合同解除的关系等问题进行了讨论。In the system of contract dissolution,the efficacy issue is related to a series of following matters such as implementation of right and obligation and solution to disputes.In China,efficacy issues of contract dissolution are mainly prescribed in item 97th and 98th of Contract Law.There are still many disagreements on how to explain and utilize the efficacy of contract dissolution.This article is to discuss the issues of retrospective effect after contract dissolution,the subsequent implementation of duty after dissolution,the application of items for account balance and clearance,the nature of restoration to its original form after dissolution,the relation between compensations for damages and dissolution of contract.
关 键 词:合同解除解除效力恢复原状损害赔偿
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222