检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《系统管理学报》2012年第6期748-755,共8页Journal of Systems & Management
基 金:国家科技支撑计划(2012BAH29F01)
摘 要:虽然公共产品技术创新与围绕私人产品进行的企业技术创新有本质上的差别,但是,政府部门完全可以利用企业已有的技术或技术研发能力开展公共产品技术创新,提升创新效率和效益。在对现实问题分析的基础上,借助创新竞赛和逆向拍卖理论,提出了企业运用已有的技术或技术研发能力参与公共产品技术创新的3种典型模式,构建了各种模式的数学模型,比较分析了不同参与模式下,政府部门所能获得的福利剩余,为政府部门根据所需技术特点运用合适的模式让企业参与公共产品技术创新提供理论依据。Although technological innovation of public goods is distinct from that of private goods, governments generally can utilize enterprises' existing technology or technology research and development capabilities to carry out technological innovation of public goods, in order to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of technological innovation. Based on the analysis of real problem about technological innovation of public goods, and employing innovation tournaments and buyer-determined reverse auction theories, we propose three different modes for enterprises to participate in technological innovation of public goods during research and development stages. We then investigate enterprises~ effort and public sectors' welfare surplus of three different modes. The study has important theoretical and realistic significance for choosing the right mode for enterprises to participate in technological innovation of public goods for public sectors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.78.141