自治与它导:竞技仲裁理念之程序表达——以CAS仲裁为例兼及对我国之启示  

Autonomy and Heteronomy:the Procedural Expression of Arbitral Ideas for Athletic Sports——Explanation on CAS Procedure and Enlightenment for China

作　　者：黄晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045

出　　处：《北京体育大学学报》2013年第1期20-24,共5页Journal of Beijing Sport University

基　　金：中国法学会2010年度部级法学研究自选课题(编号:CLS-D1040)

摘　　要：运用比较研究和实证研究的方法,讨论了竞技体育仲裁中自治与它导理念的程序表达。研究结论表明,竞技仲裁不应持平兼顾二者,而应加权考虑仲裁程序的它导取向,赋予仲裁庭在案件管辖、程序管理、证据组织及裁决作出等方面的强势力量,确保竞技体育争议得到公正且高效处理;但应慎防它导性质变为仲裁庭之独裁。研究为我国建构适合中国的竞技仲裁机制提供了理论支撑。The comparative and pragmatic research methods are employed to illustrate the procedural expression of the autonomy and heteronomy. The conclusion demonstrates that the arbitration for athletic sports should place more emphasis on the heteronomy than the autonomy, so that the arbitral tribunal could have the dominating pow- ers to have jurisdictions over cases, manage procedures, organize the evidences and deliver arbitral decisions, by which the athletic sports disputes will be resolved in an impartial and efficient way; the heteronomy should be pre- vented from dictatorship. This analysis provides the theoretical basis for the construction of arbitral mechanism for athletic sports with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：竞技体育 仲裁理念 仲裁程序 自治 它导 国际体育仲裁院 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]