媒体与当事人“共谋”中的私性话题  

On Private Affairs Communication under the ＂Conspiracy＂ by Media and Clients

作　　者：张德琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京艺术学院人文学院,南京210093

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期55-57,共3页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“新媒体传播中的隐私保护法律问题研究”（12BXW051）阶段性成果.

摘　　要：用“共谋”笼统地定义电视私性话题节目的本质问题，这一学术批评思维值得推敲。由当事人自愿公开的私性话题，一定程度上虽有媒体共谋的操纵因素，但与严格意义的“隐私”无关，以“隐私情感公开”有悖常理作为价值批判立足点需要商榷。情感当事人与媒体“共谋”现象只存在于一种情形：相对于第三方而言，隐私事项被共同隐私主体的一方强行公开，而媒体公开又以签订形式合法的责任约定策略为手段。“共谋”中的媒体权力并非无所约束，鉴于合同约定人格权的无效性，施加侵权责任对于当事人或媒体机构都具有可操作性。Private affairs disclosed by one of the parties voluntarily have nothing to do with the strict sense of ＂ privacy＂ despite media~ complicity to some extent. The emotions of the parties or clients and mediag ＂conspiracy＂ exist only in a scenario： to the third party in terms of privacy issued by the main party of common - shared privacy with force, and media disclose them by con- vention strategy as a means to sign a form of legal responsibility. Media power in the ＂conspiracy＂ is not entitled without any con- straints, in view of the invalidity of the contract personality right, impose tort liability for parties or media agencies are operable.

关 键 词：媒体权力 共同隐私 私性话题 

分 类 号：D959[政治法律—法学]