检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学管理与经济学院,昆明650093
出 处:《计算机工程与应用》2013年第5期44-47,共4页Computer Engineering and Applications
基 金:国家自然科学基金(No.71261011;No.71263031);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(No.20110491760);云南省应用基础研究计划项目(No.2011FZ021);云南省教育厅重点项目(No.2012Z103);昆明理工大学组织行为与复杂行为决策创新团队支持计划
摘 要:为克服传统DS/AHP方法中因度量标度选择问题和知识矩阵求解问题而带来的推断信息精确性差和集成结果有效性有待商榷的缺陷,结合传统方法的建模思路分析指出其中存在的问题,通过引入互补判断矩阵提取决策者对方案组与识别框架之间的相对偏好推断,在此基础上提出由残缺互补知识矩阵向BPA函数转换的定理,并结合证据折扣思想和证据组合规则构建了开展推理判断的改进方法步骤,应用一个算例说明了提出方法的具体操作过程。In order to overcome the drawbacks that inference information accuracy is poor and integration outcome validity remains to be discussed resulting from measurement scale selection and knowledge matrix solution in traditional DS/AHP method, the existing problems are presented by analyzing the traditional modeling approach. The complementary judgment matrix is introduced to extract decision maker' s relative preference inferences between alternative teams and frame of discernment. After that, a transformation theorem from knowledge matrix with incomplete and complementary information to BPA function is pro- posed, as well as an improved method is established to perform inference and judgment in terms of evidence discounting idea and evidence combination rule. A numerical example is applied to illustrate the operational process of the presented method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15