椎弓根螺钉的不同结构特点对螺钉电阻的影响  被引量:3

Experimental study of the influence of different intrinsic properties of pedicle screws on the electrical resistance

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王洪伟[1] 廖新华[2] 马显光[2] 李长青[1] 韩建达[3] 周跃[1] 

机构地区:[1]第三军医大学新桥医院骨科,重庆市400037 [2]第三军医大学生物医学工程与医学影像学院物理学教研室,重庆市400038 [3]中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所机器人学国家重点实验室,沈阳市110016

出  处:《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》2013年第3期263-266,共4页Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord

基  金:国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAI14B02);军队临床高新技术重大项目(2010gxjs072);机器人学国家重点实验室开放课题(2010-O01)

摘  要:目的:研究椎弓根螺钉的不同结构特点(实心与空心螺钉、直径)对螺钉电阻的影响,进而探讨其对刺激肌电监测椎弓根螺钉置入准确性的可能影响。方法:选择临床常用的两个厂家(强生和美敦力公司)的12枚椎弓根螺钉,每个厂家各6枚,强生公司实心与空心螺钉的直径均为5.0mm、6.0mm和7.0mm;美敦力公司实心与空心螺钉的直径均为4.5mm、5.5mm和6.5mm。用万用电表测量通过椎弓根螺钉的电流,用电位差计测量螺钉杆上间隔20mm节段的电位差,通过欧姆定律计算椎弓根螺钉的电阻值。结果:美敦力公司的4.5mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.142±0.003)Ω和(0.398±0.002)Ω,5.5mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.110±0.007)Ω和(0.347±0.003)Ω,6.5mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.086±0.002)Ω和(0.290±0.003)Ω。强生公司的5.0mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.149±0.001)Ω和(0.291±0.001)Ω,6.0mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.123±0.004)Ω和(0.237±0.001)Ω,7.0mm实心与空心椎弓根螺钉电阻分别为(0.095±0.001)Ω和(0.148±0.001)Ω。相同直径的空心椎弓根螺钉较实心椎弓根螺钉具有较大的电阻,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无论实心椎弓根螺钉或空心椎弓根螺钉,随着直径的增大,椎弓根螺钉的电阻值逐渐减小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:长度与直径相同的空心椎弓根螺钉较实心螺钉具有较大的电阻,长度相同的实心或空心小直径椎弓根螺钉具有较大的电阻,应用刺激肌电监测椎弓根螺钉置入时要注意其带来的影响。Objectives: To study the influence of pedicle screw structural features(solid and cannulated pedi- cle screws, diameters) on the electrical resistance of pediele screws and to discuss its possible effect on the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion monitored by stimulus-evoked electromyography. Methods: Electrical re- sistance measurements were obtained from 12 pedicle screw varieties(6 screws of each manufacturer: solid or cannulated pediele screws with diameter of 5.0mm, 6.0mm, 7.0mm in Johnson company and solid or eannu- lated pediele screws with diameter of 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm in Medtronic company) across the screw shank with an interval of 20mm based on measured constant current and voltage using potentiometer and multimeter according to Ohm's law. Results: Electrical resistance of pedicle screws with 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm in di- ameter was (0.142±0.003)Ω, (0.110±0.007)Ω (0.086±0.002)Ω in solid pedicle screws respectively and (0.398±0.002)Ω, (0.347±0.003)Ω, (0.290±0.003)Ω in cannulated pedicle screws respectively from Johnson company. Electrical resistance of pedicle screws with 5.0mm, 6.0mm, 7.0ram in diameter was (0.149±0.001)Ω, (0.123± 0.004)Ω, (0.095±0.001)Ω ,in solid pedicle screws and (0.291±0.001)Ω, (0.237±0.001)Ω, (0.148±0.001)Ω incannulated pedicle screws got from Medtronic company, and the electrical resistance of cannulated screws was much higher than that of solid screws in the same diameter group (P〈O.05). The screw with largest diameter had lower electrical resistance than the screws with shorter diameters, whether solid screws or cannulated screws(P〈0.05). Conclusions: Cannulated pedicle screws have higher electrical resistance compared to the sol- id pedicle screws with the same length and diameter, smaller diameter pedicle screws have higher electrical resistance compared to the larger diameter pedicle screws, we should pay much attention to its influence when stimulus-evoked electromyographic

关 键 词:椎弓根螺钉 电阻 脊柱 直径 空心 实心 

分 类 号:R318.08[医药卫生—生物医学工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象