检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王明航[1] 李建生[1,2] 李素云[1] 余学庆[1]
机构地区:[1]河南中医学院第一附属医院呼吸科,郑州450000 [2]河南中医学院老年医学研究所,郑州450008
出 处:《中华中医药杂志》2013年第3期635-640,共6页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划(No.2006BA104A13-02;临床试验注册号:ChiCTR-TRC-11001406);国家自然科学基金(No.81102665);河南省高校新世纪优秀人才支持计划(No.2006HANCET-05)~~
摘 要:目的:运用理想点法(TOPSIS)、层次分析法(AHP)和模糊综合评价法综合评价中医综合方案治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床疗效。方法:基于辨证治疗方案多维指标数据和评价指标权重,构建综合评价模型,分别运用TOPSIS法、AHP法和模糊综合评价法评价中医综合治疗方案的临床疗效。结果:TOPSIS法综合评价指数试验组(0.748)高于对照组(0.252);AHP法综合评分指数试验组(1.1407)高于对照组(0.9102);模糊综合评价法最大隶属度试验组(0.2779)大于对照组(0.2655)。结论:3种综合评价方法均显示中医综合治疗方案的临床疗效试验组均优于对照组,能够适用于中医药多维结局指标综合评价研究。Objective: Adopting the technique for order preferenceby similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approachs to evaluate the clinical effectiveness fot the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment project with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Based on COPD syndrome differentiation multidimensional indexes datas and evaluation index weight, the research constructed the comprehensive evaluation models and evaluated the clinical effectiveness fot the TCM treatment project by the TOPSIS and AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approachs. Results: The comprehensive evaluation indexs of the experimental group (0.748) was higher than those of the control group(0.252) with the TOPSIS. The integrated assessment indexs of the experimental group(1.1407) were better than those of the control group(0.9102) with the AHP. The maximum membership of the experimental group(0.2779) was better than that of the control group(0.2655) with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approachs. Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of the experimental group with the TCM treatment protocols were better than those of the the control group by the the three comprehensive evaluation approachs. The three methods could be suitable for the comprehensive evaluation study of multidimensional outcomes indexs of TCM.
分 类 号:R259[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158