检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱俊杰[1] 闵昌运[1] 周艳艳[1] 张锋[1]
机构地区:[1]宁波大学心理学系,宁波315211
出 处:《应用心理学》2012年第4期374-382,共9页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社会科学一般项目(10YJAXJX024)成果;浙江省大学生科技创新活动新苗人才计划2013年度项目的资助
摘 要:通过两项实验,分别在收益和损失情境中,比较了个体为不同人际亲密度的他人提供决策建议时的风险偏好,并考察了决策采纳度对人际亲密度影响为他人提供决策建议的风险偏好的调节作用。实验结果发现:(1)相对于低亲密度他人,被试在收益情境中针对高亲密度他人的决策行为表现出高风险寻求倾向,但在损失情境中无此效应(实验1);(2)高决策采纳度可削弱个体在收益情境中对目标他人(特别是对低亲密度他人)决策建议的风险偏好,而增强个体在损失情境中对目标他人(特别是对低亲密度他人)决策建议的风险偏好(实验2)。这些结果表明,人际亲密度对他人风险决策偏好具有重要影响,且受决策采纳度的调节。The present study compared risk preference in decision making between people with different levels of interper- sonal intimacy under gain and lose condition respective- ly by two experiments. We also investigated the moder- ate effect of decision acceptability on the relationship between interpersonal intimacy and risk preference. The results showed : ( 1 ) compared with making decisions h^r low intimacy others, participants preferred higher risk taking when making decisions for individuals with high intimacy under the gain condition, but not under the lose condition (Experiment 1);(2) the risk preference for targets, especially those with low intimacy, was weakened under the gain condition and increased under the lose condition by the high decision acceptability (Experiment 2). These results suggested a significant effect of interpersonal intimacy on the risk preference when making decision for others, which was moderated by the decision acceptability.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229