“能动司法”之反思  

The reflection of the "active judicature"

作　　者：刘杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2013年第1期5-9,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

基　　金：国家社会科学规划基金项目"法治哲学探源"(项目编号:10BFX009)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要："能动司法"从理论逻辑上说有成立和存在的合理性,但在不同的政治法律传统下,能动司法不仅有不同的形态,而且实际效果可能南辕北辙。能动司法既可以成为法治秩序的一部分,也可能成为人治在司法领域的代名词。对于缺少法治传统的中国法律实践,必须格外强调把能动司法限定在法治的框架内,特别警惕借能动司法之名行司法人治之实。在形式主义、规范主义的法治观尚未扎根的情况下,法社会学作为"能动司法"赖以存在的理论基础可能向人治社会的政法理论传统回归,能动司法必须在法治的框架下追求社会效果与法律效果的统一。There is established and existedrationality of ＂active judicature＂ from the theoretical logic. But under different politi- cal and legal traditions, there are different forms of active judicature, and the actual results may be poles apart. Active judica- ture can either become part of the rule of law or become the synonym of the rule of man in the field of justice. For the legal practice lack of the tradition of the rule of law, we must extremely stress to define the active judicature within the framework of the rule of law, especially be vigilant a- gainst the rule of man in the name of ac- tive judicature. In the condition that the rule of law concept of the formalism and normativism not yet taken root, the society of rule of law as the theoretical basis for the ＂dynamic judicature＂ possibly return to the political and legal theory tradition of soci- ety of rule of man, and the active judica- ture must pursue the unity of social effect and legal effect in the framework of the rule of law.

关 键 词：能动司法 法治 人治 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]