司法的法理与能动司法的限度——一个内在视角评论的论纲  

Judicial legal and active judicial limit——an internal perspective comment

作　　者：王勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2013年第1期10-12,共3页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要："能动司法"作为一个中国式问题的特殊性在于法律意识场景中的"明辨是非"与"惩恶扬善"的功能性期待和负载。理解"能动司法"问题的关键在于理解司法权的性质。在当代中国的司法场景中,如何让"能动司法"内在性支持司法权"依法独立行使"才是问题的一个关键面相。而这个问题关涉到两个方面,一个是司法权"独立行使",而不是来自其他非司法部门的干预,另一方面是司法权如何"依法"而不是依据其他非法律根据的行使。这两方面的问题所在才是"能动司法"在中国成为一个特殊性问题的根源所在。＂Active Justice＂ as a Chinese problem, whose particularity is the functional expectations and loads of ＂telling right from wrong＂ and ＂encouraging the good and punishing the evil＂ in the scene of legal consciousness. The key to un- derstand the ＂active justice＂is to understand the nature of the judicial power. In the contemporary China＇s judicial scene, how to make ＂active justice＂ internally support ＂ independent exercise＂ of jurisdiction is one of the key problems. And this problem is related to two aspects, one is the ＂in- dependent exercise＂ of judicial power, rather than intervention from other non judicial departments, the other is how to exercise the judicial power by law rather than other rules. The two aspects of the problem are the root of the particularity of ＂active justice＂ in China.

关 键 词：能动司法 司法权 正义 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]