检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院,北京100083 [2]中国国土资源经济研究院,北京101149
出 处:《国土资源科技管理》2013年第1期102-108,共7页Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources
基 金:国家土地督察广州局资助项目
摘 要:为帮助我国企业熟悉东盟市场环境,借鉴完善我国土地财税体制,对东盟与我国的土地税费政策进行了比较研究。与东盟国家相比,我国土地税费政策主要存在地方性土地收费项目繁多、土地税费收益用于民生开支不足、土地税费政策调控房地产市场的作用还没有得到充分体现等缺陷。因此,可以借鉴东盟国家土地税费征收经验,通过正税清费,提高土地税费的市场调控能力,改革财税体制,完善土地收益分配关系,以及加强土地收益使用监管等措施进一步完善我国土地税费政策。In order to help Chinese enterprises to be familiar with the ASEAN market environment and to improve the system of land tax in China, this paper makes a comparative analysis of land tax system in ASEAN countries and China. Comparing with ASEAN countries, such disadvantages exist in our land tax system as various items of charge in local land tax, inadequacy of benefit from land tax to people's livelihood, and insufficient function of land tax system's control in real estate market. It is thus suggested that experiences in land tax system in ASEAN countries can be adopted to improve land tax system of China by means of normal tax and clearing tees and through strengthening the power of land tax in market regulation and control, reforming tax system, improving the relationship of land benefit distribution and strengthening the supervision of land benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.81.178