检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北农业大学体育工作部,河北保定071001
出 处:《河北农业大学学报(农林教育版)》2013年第1期65-67,共3页Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei
摘 要:体育课考核是体育课教学中的重要组成部分,是实现教学目标、评价教学质量的基本手段。分析了河北农业大学体育课考核现状,发现考核标准不能适应新课标要求、理论课比例太少、同课教师考核标准不能统一化等问题,并提出了终结性考核观念向过程性考核观念转变、重视理论知识传授与考察、变"教考分离"为"教考离合"模式等体育课考核改革思路。Evaluation of Physical Education Course (EPEC), as a basic means of realizing the teaching goals and evaluating the teaching quality, is an important part of the physical education teaching. Through interviews with teaching experts, the article rationally analyzes the current situation of EPEC in Hebei Agricultural University. The article reveals that the existing assessment criteria cannot be adapted to the new curriculum requirements. With a low proportion of theory classes, the assessment criteria can not be unified for teachers of the same class. Therefore, the article proposes that the concept of conclusive evaluation should be changed to procedural evaluation. And the EPEC reform should be focused on the teaching and examining of theoretical knowledge by changing the mode "Separation in Teaching and Testing" to "Teaching and Testing clutch " mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38