体育运动知识之惑:基于当代认识论争议的分析  

Bewilderment of Sports Knowledge: Based on the Analysis of the Dispute of Contemporary Epistemology

作　　者：高强[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学体育与健康学院,青少年健康评价与运动干预教育部重点实验室,上海200241

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2013年第2期9-14,共6页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目:中国体育发展方式改革研究;项目编号:10ZD&052;2012年度国家社会科学基金青年项目:当代哲学认识论视域下的体育运动研究;项目编号:12CTY001

摘　　要：体育运动的知识之惑可以被理解为"体育运动是否形成知识?"这一疑问。针对这一疑问,在体育运动中,具有何种形态的知识,且何种知识的在先的问题就首当其冲了。当代认识论的争议与发展为这一知识之惑的解惑提供了理论支持。格里门对知识定义的表达说为体育运动中处处存在的主体性行为和体验纳入知识体系提供了可能性,从波普尔、哈克到波兰尼的争论在体育运动中区隔出了主体性知识和客观性知识两种知识形式,而后期维特根斯坦学派对认识论的"实践转向"确立了体育运动中主体性知识的基础性地位。在体育运动中引入当代认识论的争议,既为体育运动平添了知识的色彩,同时也为默会认识论的研究提供了全新的研究场域。The bewilderment of sports knowledge can be understood as the question of ＂ whether sports knowledge has been formed ？＂ , in which what form of knowledge and which comes first in sports should be the question to be asked first of all. The controversy and development of contemporary epistemology has provided theoretical support for the solution of the bewilderment of sports knowledge. Grimen＇ s definition of knowledge makes it possible for the subjective behavior and experience widely existent in sports to be included in knowledge system. The dispute between Popper, Huck and Polanyi results in subjective and objective sports knowledge, while the later ＂practice turn＂ of epistemology by the Wittgenstein school establishes the basic status of subjective sports knowledge. The introduction of contemporary epistemological dispute into sports not only enriches sports with knowledge but also provides new research field for epistemology.

关 键 词：体育运动 知识 认识论 

分 类 号：G807.4[文化科学—体育训练]