“盗者之真赃”——由王国维推许《家语疏证》说经典辨伪学“范式”的扩大化  

The Booty of the Thief——The Discussion on the Expansion of the Classical Paradigm of Literature Discrimination Studies from Wang Guowei's Praise of the Jiayu Shuzheng

作　　者：宁镇疆[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学历史系,上海200444

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2013年第1期35-41,共7页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"<孔子家语>新证(08CZS022)";上海市教委"曙光学者"计划项目"古书成书模式研究"(10SG39);上海市教委重点学科(J50106)资助项目

摘　　要：经典辨伪学"辑佚"的方法论"范式",本身即不无问题。孙志祖于此未察,转而将此法用之于《孔子家语》的辨伪,将先秦、两汉古书之间常见的"互见"现象认定为造作之迹,既昧于古书体例,也反映了经典辨伪学"范式"扩大化的弊病。先秦、两汉古书之间的"互见"乃古书之常例,故每每溢出辨伪学的惯常逻辑,这既昭示经典辨伪学的"限度"问题,也凸显目下古书体例及古书成书研究对于经典辨伪学方法论革新之重要意义。There are contradictions in the Methodology Paradigm of Literature Discrimination itself. Paying little attention to these contradictions, Zhizu Sun adopts this method to further discriminate Confucius Jiayu, and maintains this to be the forged evidence since there is so much content that is same among different literatures. Sun＇ s opinion indicates that he has misunderstood the regulations of Chinese ancient literature, and it also shows that the classical paradigm of literature discrimination has expanded. The phenomenon of different literatures with same content is very common in the pre-Han dynasty, so there are contradictions between this phenomenon and the discrimination logic. Therefore, it is obvious that there is a limitation in the paradigm of literature discrimination, and the current ancient literature regulations and studies are of great significance in innovating the methodology of literature discrimination.

关 键 词：辨伪 辑佚 孔子家语 扩大化 古书体例 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]