检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》2013年第2期119-129,共11页Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基 金:教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目(12YJA790068);山东省教育厅高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(J12WG15)
摘 要:以贸易理论为基础,以31个中国工业行业2003-2010年数据,建立面板计量模型验证该影响机制,并将TFP效应进行分解,分析了参与垂直专业化中行业差异造成不同影响效应的原因。实证检验结果表明:参与垂直专业化有利于工业行业总体TFP的提高,但资本密集度高、出口外向度高和市场集中度低的行业参与垂直专业化更有利于行业TFP的提升;行业差异的不同影响效应是通过对技术效率效应(EF)和技术进步效应(TE)的不同效果而影响TFP变化结果的。In this paper, I empirically make an analysis on the related data of China's 31 indus- tries from 2003 to 2010 to testify the functioning mechanism of vertical specialization on the total factor productivity (TFP) based on the trade theory. Furthermore, I also make explanation about the reason for the different effect of different industry, and TFP is dispersed into two effects. In this paper, it concludes that the industries in the vertical specialization with high capital and export intensity can improve the TFP while the industries with high market-concentration can not. And different effects of industry differences will has an impact on changes of TFP through the different effects of technical efficiency (EF) and technical progress (TE).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222