检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅有明[1]
出 处:《重庆三峡学院学报》2013年第2期37-41,共5页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
基 金:福建省教育厅高等学校教学质量工程资助项目(ZL0902/TZ(SJ));三明学院教学改革课题项目(L1211/Q)阶段性成果
摘 要:采用面板随机效应模型,对我国东中西部政策效应对居民消费影响的空间差异性进行分析,根据研究结果发现:财政支出政策对居民消费的影响效果要远远大于财政收入政策效果;从城乡差异来看,财政政策对农村居民消费影响的效果较大,对城镇居民消费影响效果较小,这种特点特别表现在财政支出效果上;从区域差异上,财政支出政策对东部地区居民消费表现出更强的凯恩斯效应,对中西部地区居民消费则呈现更强的非凯恩斯效应,这种特征差异的原因可能是源于区域消费特征的差异;扩张财政政策在东中部效应显著,在西部紧缩性政策效果更为明显。This paper uses panel random effect model to analyze the impact of spatial difference of resident consumption in Western and Central China. The results show that the effect of fiscal spending policy on resident consumption is much larger than that of fiscal revenue policy; Viewed from the differences between urban and rural areas, the effect of the impact of fiscal policy on rural resident consumption of urban residents is small, which is particularly reflected in the effect of fiscal spending; Viewed from regional differences, the consumption effect of residents by fiscal spending policy in the eastern region showed stronger Keynesian effect, rendering more non-Keynesian effects on consumption of residents in the central and western regions. This feature differences may be due to the difference of regional consumption characteristics. Expansion fiscal policy effect is obvious in the East, while tightening policy effect is more obvious in the West.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169