检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉体育学院体育教育学院,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《武汉体育学院学报》2013年第3期88-92,共5页Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基 金:湖北省教育厅科技处B类项目研究成果(B20123303)
摘 要:对第30奥运会中国男篮和竞争对手五场比赛抢攻战术运用各项指标进行比较与分析。结果表明:中国男篮的抢攻得分较少;个人能力抢攻的主要进攻手段是中投和突破上篮,3分球和篮下强攻的运用次数较少;集体能力抢攻中的传切、突分和掩护成功率较高,策应配合对集体能力抢攻没有影响,而接球投篮对其影响较大;在抢攻发动来源上,后场篮板球发动次数最多、成功率最高;2分球得分是抢攻得分方式的主要手段;抢攻统计结果表明,个人能力抢攻、集体能力抢攻和竞争对手存在差距。Indexes of contesting offense of the Chinese Men' s Basketball Team of the five games at the 30th Olym- pic Games showed that China' s contesting offensives for scoring was scarce. Personal ability of those main offensive means was mainly perimeter shoot and driving layup. Three point ball and attacks by storm were not often used. The collective ability in the battle for cutting, process points and cover was good. The posting up was not influential while catching and shooting was important to the collective ability. Defensive rebound launched most of the times and achieved the highest success rate. Two point goals were most common. Those results show that personal and col- lective contesting offensive lagged behind that of the opposing teams.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44