检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秋华[1,2] 刘文国[3] 李世友[1,2] 陶汝坤[1] 李明华[1] 吴从起[1] 阮德振[1]
机构地区:[1]西南林业大学土木工程学院,云南昆明650224 [2]云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点实验室,云南昆明650224 [3]国家林业局昆明勘察设计院,云南昆明650216
出 处:《江西农业大学学报》2013年第1期138-143,共6页Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis
基 金:云南省应用基础研究计划(2011FZ136);火灾科学国家重点实验室开放基金(HK2010-KF11);云南省教育厅科研项目(2011Y279);西南林业大学科研启动金(111101)资助
摘 要:通过外业调查和实验室测定,利用载量和单位面积热量2个关键指标,研究了昆明西山国家森林公园的华山松、云南油杉、滇青冈、地盘松、麻栎和旱冬瓜6个主要林型粗死木质残体(CWD)的燃烧性。结果表明,粗死木质残体燃烧性最强的是地盘松,最弱的是云南油杉,华山松、滇青冈和麻栎的燃烧性很接近,旱冬瓜的燃烧性仅微大于云南油杉,因此,燃烧性从强到弱依次为地盘松、麻栎、滇青冈、华山松、旱冬瓜和云南油杉。By plot surveying in Xishan National Forest Park of Kunming and lab experiments, using 2 key factors including fuel loading and heat value of unit area, the combustibility of Coarse woody debris of six main forest types consisting of Pinus armandii Franch, Keteleeria evelyniana Mast, Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides Schot- tky, Piuus Yunnanensis Vat Paamaea, Quercus acutissima Carr and Alnus nepalensis D. Don was studied. The results showed that the combustibility of CWD of Piuus Yunnanensis Vat Paamaea was the Strongest in the six forest types, while that of Keteleeria evelyniana Mast was the weakest. The eombustibilities of Pinus armandii Franeh, Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides Sehottky, and Quercus acutissirna Carr were closely similar, and that of Al- rtus nepalensis D. Don was close to that of Keteleeria evelyniana Mast. The combustibilities of these six CWD were in the order: Pinus Yunnanensis Var Paamaea, Quercus acutissima Carr, Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides Schottky, Pinus armandii Franch, Alnus nepalensis D. Don and Keteleeria evelyniana Mast.
分 类 号:S759.91[农业科学—森林经理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157