检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北师范学院经济与管理学院,湖北黄石435002 [2]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《统计与信息论坛》2013年第3期63-67,共5页Journal of Statistics and Information
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目
摘 要:中国的经济增长模式正从外需增长转向内需增长,而内需增长的核心是建立在城市化基础上的,城市化已成为中国经济持续增长的另一引擎。为反映城市化对CO2排放的影响,利用STIRPAT模型研究1978—2010年期间不同发展阶段的东中西区域城市化对于碳排放的影响与效应。研究发现:对处于不同发展阶段的三个样本,城市化水平对各省碳排放均为正相关关系,说明中国经济在快速增长阶段城市化的推进带来了碳排放的增加,但这种正相关的关系并不显著,因城市化的进程会引起环境问题,进一步的城市化则慢慢消除了环境问题;无论是东部、中部还是西部地区,人均收入与碳排放、碳强度与碳排放的关系显著为正。鉴此,减排的重点在于降低碳强度,并可通过技术进步和能源结构的变迁减少碳排放。Chinas economic growth pattern is shifting from external demand growth to internal demand growth. The key of internal demand growth is on the basis of urbanization. Urbanization will become another engine to maintain China's sustainable growth. To show the influence of urbanization to carbon emissions, this paper utilized KAYA equation to study the influence of economic growth and urbanization to carbon emissions. This paper used the data between 1978 and 2009 to study the relationship between carbon emissions, carbon intensity, GDP per capital and urbanization. Johansen Cointegration found that carbon emissions had long term stable relationship with carbon intensity, GDP per capital and urbanization. Carbon intensity had negative influence on China's carbon emissions. Urbanization had positive and weak influence on Chinas carbon emissions, which indicates that urbanization increases carbon emissions. While GDP per capital had negative influence on carbon emissions. By causality tests, we found that urbanization is the granger reason of carbon emissions, which is due to the characteristics of high energy-consuming.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.247.50