检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尚继征[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第1期70-75,共6页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:传统民法理论所依据的社会生活发生了巨大变迁,民事主体由抽象向具体发展,部分民事主体互换性逐步丧失。私法的社会化随之兴起,针对市场经济交换领域中弱势群体保护之单行立法需要理论体系上的必要诠释。私法身份扩张之主张因其强弱标准难以界定而模糊不清,因其与民法典固有之亲属身份异质而无法统一,因其违背民法之既有调整方式而无法在法典中表达。因此,私法上的身份范畴应固守于亲属身份范围。The social living conditions in which the traditional civil law was established have changed greatly, and the civil subjects are changing from abstract to specific. The interchanges of some civil subjects have lost, and the socialization of the pri- vate law is rising. There is great necessity to explain the strong and weak subjects that happened in the market economy, The ex- pansion of the civil status is faint because it is hard to distinguish from strong from weak. It is also hard to consolidate because it is different from kinship status, and it is difficult to express in the civil code because it breaches the style of the adjusting of civil law. So the status of the private law should be kept in the kinship status.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7