善意相对人撤销权的正当性检讨——以我国《合同法》第47条、第48条为基点  

The Justification Review of the Good Faith Party’s Rights of Cancellation——Based on Article 47 and 48 of Contract Law of China

作　　者：林承铎[1] 贾先川[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国际学院 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第1期76-81,共6页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：北京市哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目(项目批准号:FXC035)

摘　　要：我国《合同法》第47条第2款、第48条第2款分别规定了与限制行为能力人、无权代理人订立合同的善意相对人的撤销权。通说认为,无权处分和表见代理中的善意相对人也同样享有撤销权。然而,事实上,不管在理论层面、规范层面还是在制度层面、实践层面,善意相对人撤销权的正当性都值得检讨,因此,其存在的合理性应受质疑。The cancellation rights entitled to the other party in good faith, who concludes a contract by person with limited capacity for civil act and unauthorized agent, is confirmed by Paragraph 2 of Article 47 and Paragraph 2 of Article 48 of the Con- tract Law of. China. In general theory, the other party in good faith, in a contract by person with apparent agency authority and unauthorized disposal of property has the cancellation right. But in fact, the rationality of the cancellation right is due to be ques- tioned in the sense of theory, specification, system and fact. Consequently, legitimacy of the existence of cancellation right should be reviewed.

关 键 词：善意相对人 撤销权 效力待定行为 追认权 

分 类 号：D923.65[政治法律—民商法学]