检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连大学东北亚研究院
出 处:《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》2013年第2期97-104,128,共8页Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BSS016);教育部人文社会科学基金一般项目(09YJA770004)
摘 要:朝鲜独立问题,在近代东北亚国际关系史上具有举足轻重的地位。19世纪70年代后,日本通过"日朝修好条规"逼迫朝鲜开港,并试图强行将朝鲜"独立之邦"的虚像实化,清政府遂开始着手调整和加强与朝鲜之间旧有的"宗藩"关系。以"壬午军变"的解决为转折点,清政府与朝鲜之间的关系得以逐渐加强,而日本对朝鲜的控制力则开始下降。考察开港及"壬午军变"前后的中日两国对朝策略,进而探析日本武力解决与谈判处理两种策略的抉择及"甲申政变"后选择与清政府"妥协"的细微之处与深层原因,可以了解19世纪70至80年代中日朝三国的互动关系及其对东北亚国际格局的影响。Korea’s independence played a decisive role in the modern East Asian international relations history. In 1970s, Japan adopted the 'Japan-Korea Provisions of Cordial Relations' to push Korea to open the port, and attempted to force Korea to turn the virtual image 'Independent States' into reality. The Qing government started to adjust and enhance the old 'Suzerain and Vassal State' relations with Korea. The solution of ' Im-ou military revolt' enhanced unprecedentedly the relationship between Korea and the Qing government. Centered around Korea before and after the opening port and 'Im-ou military revolt', this paper analysed two strategy choices of the Japanese force and negotiation process and the deeper reasons why the Qing government compromised, and then studied the interactive relationship between China, Korea and Japan in modern times and its effects on the trend of Northeast Asia international relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30