氧气雾化与超声雾化吸入氨溴索治疗毛细支气管炎效果分析  

Analysis on therapy effect of oxygen atomization and ultrasonic atomization inhalation of ambroxol to treat capillary bronchitis

作　　者：刘国群[1] 魏兵[1] 康钰[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省崇州市妇幼保健院儿科,四川崇州611230

出　　处：《吉林医学》2013年第4期641-642,共2页Jilin Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的:探讨氧气雾化和超声雾化吸入氨溴索辅助治疗婴幼儿毛细支气管炎的效果。方法:将164例毛细支气管炎婴幼儿随机分为治疗组(84例)和对照组(80例),两组常规治疗和雾化药物均相同,治疗组使用氧气雾化吸入,对照组使用超声雾化吸入。结果:治疗组显效41例(48.81%),有效22例(26.19%),无效21例(25.00%),总有效率75.00%;对照组显效27例(33.75%),有效17例(21.25%),无效36例(45.00%),总有效率55.00%;两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=20.78,P<0.01)。结论:氧气雾化吸入氨溴索辅助治疗婴幼儿毛细支气管炎效果满意,优于超声雾化。Objective To discuss the therapy effect of oxygen atomization and ultrasonic atomization inhalation of ambroxol on infants with capillary bronchitis. Method 164 infants with capillary bronchitis were randomly divided into treatment group （84 cases） and control group （80 cases）, and were treated with the same medicine for both ordinary treatment and atomization treatment. Results In treatment group,41 cases were significantly effective （48.18%） ,22 cases were effective（26. 19% ） ,21cases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 75.0%. While in control group,27 cases were significantly effective （33.75%） ,17 cases were effective（21.25% ） ,36 cases were ineffective（45% ） and the total effective rate was 55%. The difference between the total ratios of effectiveness of the two groups was statisti- cally significant.x2 = 20.78, P 〈 0. 01. Conclusion The therapy effect of auxiliary treatment on infants with capillary bronchitis by using ox- ygen atomization inhalation of ambroxol is satisfied and better than that of by using ultrasonic atomization.

关 键 词：氧气雾化 超声雾化 吸入 氨溴索 毛细支气管炎 

分 类 号：R725.6[医药卫生—儿科]