检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李娜[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300071
出 处:《沈阳大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第1期30-33,共4页Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
摘 要:分析了我国价格听证的现实状况,认为公共政策合法化需要满足两个要件,即形式合法和过程合法,要使这两个要件同时达成,则需满足一定的条件。从公共政策合法化的角度来看,由于价格听证法律法规尚不完善、听证代表的选出缺少法律依据、听证信息不对称、民众参与意识不足等原因,我国许多地方的价格决策听证会在实施中仍存在形式和运作上的缺陷,致使价格听证流于形式。完善法律法规、吸纳公民参与,以及合理界定政府角色,有助于完善我国的价格决策听证制度。The status of the price decision-making hearings in China is analyzed. The legitimation of public policy needs to meet two requirements: the legitimation of form and process. In order to make these two elements reached at the same time, it is required to meet certain conditions. From the view of public policy legitimation, due to the imperfect price hearing laws and regulations, the lack of a legal basis for the hearing deputy, the hearing information asymmetry, and the lack of awareness of public participation and so on, There are still defects on the form and operation in the price decision-making hearing implementation in many places of China, resulting in price hearings a mere formality. Through the improvement of laws and regulations, attracting citizen participation and a reasonable definition of the role of government, it will be a help to improve our price decision-making hearing system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222