检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王京娜[1] 张庆[1] 黄砚颖 邢志俐[1] 郑鸿飞[1] 张勃[1] 姜峰[1] 赵志伟[1] 何权瀛[3]
机构地区:[1]承德医学院附属医院呼吸科,河北承德067000 [2]承德第五监狱医院,河北承德067000 [3]北京大学人民医院呼吸科,北京100044
出 处:《医学与哲学(B)》2013年第1期32-34,共3页Medicine & Philosophy(B)
摘 要:调查重大肇事司机打鼾的患病率,打鼾和ESS评分的关系以及打鼾对交通事故的影响。对350例肇事司机进行现况问卷调查。结果重大肇事司机的打鼾患病率为44.9%,打鼾司机ESS评分≥9分者明显高于无打鼾司机(χ2=13.64,P<0.01),打鼾所致交通事故发生率和其他常见原因接近,肇事司机对打鼾的认知程度低,需引起临床医生和行政管理部门的重视。This is to investigate the prevalence of snoring in drivers in serious traffic accidents. Having the comparison ofsnorings and non-snoring group in ESS score, and their effects on the traffic safety. 350 subjects was investigated by a questionnaire. Among the 350 drivers, the prevalence of snoring in drivers in traffic accidents was 44.9%. It is similar be- tween snoring and other factors in traffic accident. The ESS score≥9 in snoring group was higher than in non-snoring group, there was statistically significant differences between the two groups( X^2 = 13.64, P〈0.01). Drivers in traffic acci- dents have little awareness of snoring, so we and our government should pay attention to snoring and OSAS in drivers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227