电脑验光在招飞体检中的应用研究  

Study on application of computer optometry in physical examination of candidates of flying cadets

作　　者：张勇[1] 栾信山[1] 林年香 王庆元[1] 陈杰民[2] 唐宝才 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军第466医院,北京100089 [2]空军总医院,北京100036

出　　处：《中华航空航天医学杂志》2000年第2期108-111,共4页Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine

摘　　要：目的　了解电脑验光的准确性 ,探讨电脑验光能否替代传统的验光技术在招飞体检中的应用。　方法　通过对 6 5 7例 1314眼正常视力男青年的小瞳孔电脑验光、散瞳后电脑验光和散瞳后人工检影验光检查 ,对比其符合率 ;并进行了三种不同方法验光招飞淘汰情况的比较。　结果　两种不同方法散瞳后验光与小瞳孔电脑验光的结果存在着很大差异 ,两种不同方法电脑验光的招飞淘汰率较检影验光的淘汰率明显增高 ,小瞳孔电脑验光的结果尤为明显。　结论　在招飞体检中电脑验光尚不能完全替代检影验光 ,否则 ,应首先修改招飞体检中屈光检查的标准。Objective To learn the accuracy of computer optometric techniques using traditional optometry as standard and the feasibility of using computer optometry to replace the traditional method. Method A group of candidates with normal visual acuity ( n =657) were examined by dynamic computer dioptoscopy (DCD), cycloplegic computer dioptoscopy (CCD) and cycloplegic retinoscopy (CR) respectively. The dioptometric results from the 3 methods and disqualifying rates according to the current standard were compared. Result There were significant differences among the results from the 3 methods, especially between the results from DCD and CR. The disqualifying rate using DCD is much higher than that using CR. Conclusion Computer optometry can not be used to replace retinoscopy unless the corresponding standards were set up.

关 键 词：电脑验光 体格检查 屈光检查 飞行员选拔 

分 类 号：R194.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]