检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈静[1]
出 处:《南方金融》2013年第2期48-51,共4页South China Finance
摘 要:欧洲债务危机爆发前,欧盟内部没有成员国之间的跨国金融救助机制,欧洲中央银行也不对欧元区内的金融机构履行最后贷款人职责。因此,欧洲债务危机救助经历了从最初的临时性单项救助计划到欧洲金融稳定基金、再到欧洲稳定机制的复杂过程。欧洲稳定机制与以往临时性的救助机制和工具相比具有明显优势,将成为今后欧元区危机救助的主要力量,并在一定程度上推动了欧盟财政一体化建设。但是,再好的危机救助机制也只能换取时间,不能替代任何具体的改革政策,欧元区危机国必须实行改革以实现经济持续增长、降低债务水平。Before the outbreak of the European debt crisis, there was no cross - border financial bailout mechanism between member states within the EU. Besides, the European Central Bank also does not act as the lender of last resort for financial institutions in the euro area. Therefore, the bailout arrangement of European debt crisis developed from the temporary stand - alone program to European Financial Stability Facility, then to European Stability Mechanism. The European Stability Mechanism has many superiorities compared with the EFSF, and would became a major force in bailing out countries plagued by debt crisis in the euro area and to some extent initiated the EU fiscal integrafion. However, the best interventions are just for times and are not substitute for such policies. Crisis countries themselves are required to carry out the unavoidable reforms that create the conditions for sustainable growth and reduction of public debts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117