检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]绍兴文理学院附属医院检验科,312000 [2]绍兴市人民医院检验科 [3]绍兴市富盛镇社区卫生服务中心检验科 [4]绍兴文理学院附属医院内科,312000
出 处:《中国糖尿病杂志》2013年第3期264-266,共3页Chinese Journal of Diabetes
摘 要:目的提高不同检测系统测定HbA1c结果的可比性,为实验室间HbA1c结果的互认提供参考。方法用新鲜混合全血标本赋值传递并行方法学比对,比较赋值传递前后胶乳增强免疫比浊法(LETIA)与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)的可比性。结果与HPLC法相比LETIA法经赋值传递后在医学决定水平处的偏倚由8.83%下降到0.65%。结论用新鲜混合全血标本作赋值传递并行方法学比对可提高HbA1c结果的可比性。Objective To improve the comparability of HbA1 c results from different detecting systems, to provide the valuable reference for the mutual recognition of HbA1c results among medical laboratories. Methods The fresh mixed whole-blood samples were used for transferring value-assignment and methodology comparison in order to compare the comparability of two methods, namely the Latex enhanced turbid-metric Immunoassay (LETIA) and the High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), before and after transferring value-assignment. Results Compared with HPLC method, after transferring value-assignment, the LETIA method made the bias at medical decision level decreased from 8. 83% to 0. 65%. Conclusion The comparability of HbA1 c results is improved by transferring value-assignment and methodology comparison with the fresh mixed whole-blood samples.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117