检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢惠加[1]
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学大学法学院、知识产权学院,广东广州510006
出 处:《学术研究》2013年第3期52-58,159,共7页Academic Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目“网络版权终端用户权利保障机制研究”(12CXW047)的阶段性成果
摘 要:我国著作权刑事保护政策受制于外来压力,被动急速变迁,缺乏自身的制度演进逻辑,过于强调通过立法提高保护水平而忽视了法律本身的针对性和操作性。我国著作权刑事立法应客观认识刑事保护的合理性和有效性,充分反映著作权的特殊属性,系统分析刑事保护的经济、社会、文化制约因素,高度重视著作权刑事政策的实施机制,有效避免立法依赖,减缓著作权刑事立法节奏,警惕刑事保护扩大化的趋势。Because of foreign pressures,China’s criminal policy on copyright protection has been frequently amended in a passive manner without its own evolution logic.The amendments attach too much emphasis on improving the level of protection through legislation but ignore the pertinence and operability of law.China should reverse the current tendency of criminal protection for copyright,So,relevant legislation is expected to analyze the rationality and effectiveness of criminal protection,fully reflect the special attributes of copyright,and systemically analyze the economic,social and cultural restraining factors,attaching great importance to the criminal copyright enforcement mechanisms.Thus,China can effectively avoid legislative dependence,slow down the pace of copyright criminal legislation,and prevent the expansion of copyright criminal protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15