检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北大学经济管理学院,陕西西安710127 [2]西安理工大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安710054
出 处:《当代经济科学》2013年第2期88-95,127,共8页Modern Economic Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71033003);国家社科基金青年项目(11CJY054);教育部第51批博士后基金项目(2012M512018);陕西省青年科技新星项目(2012KJXX-36)
摘 要:增加农村公共产品提供可以用来缩小农户间收入差距吗?通过构建简要两期生产模型,揭示农村公共产品不同成本分担模式对农户收入差距影响机理,并采用陕西5个县20个村400户农户调研数据验证了公共产品提供对农村居民收入差距的影响。发现:仅有通过对农村居民征收收入税的方式来提供消费性公共产品,才会缩小收入差距;通过政府拨款方式或通过农户一事一议集资提供农村生产性公共产品,都会拉大收入差距;而通过合作社集资方式提供农村生产性公共产品,对农户收入差距的最终影响须视具体情况而定。We should provide more public goods to reduce the income gap of farmers? This paper discloses the effect of different cost sharing patterns of rural public goods on the income gap of farmers by building simple two-period production model and verifies the influence of provision of public goods on the income gap of rural residents by the research data of 400 farmers in 20 villages of 5 counties in Shaanxi.We find that only by providing consumptive public goods by means of levying income tax from rural residents can the income gap be narrowed.The income gap will be enlarged if providing productive rural public goods by means of government appropriation or raising funds by farmers on case-by-case basis.If providing productive rural public goods by raising funds by co-operatives,the final effect on the income gap of farmers depends on the concrete situation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145