检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨竞业[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]仲恺农业工程学院人文社科系,广东广州510225
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期116-121,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学规划基金资助项目(11BKS011)
摘 要:"底线论"和"边界论"都不能彻底解决交往行动的伦理界限问题。由底线和边界共同建制的"界线论"是解决这一难题的可能路径。底线是伦理场域的基础界限,是自律性的自觉理性和他律性的自由理性的统一。边界是伦理场域的伸缩界限,是有限度的广度和有广度的限度的统一。界线是伦理场域的立体界限,是个人底线与社会边界的合构,是主体内在限度与客体外在尺度的建构。Both the Baseline Theory and the Border Theory can not fully solve the problem of ethical boundary in the communicative action. The Boundary Theory, by jointly establishing the baseline and the border, is likely to provide a solution to this thorny issue. The baseline serves as a basic boundary of ethics field, which is united by the self-conscious rationality of self-discipline and the free rationality of heteronomy. The border is an expansible boundary of ethics field, which is united by the limited scope and the limit of width. As a three-dimensional boundary of ethics field, it is co- structured by personal baselines and social boundaries, and constructed by the subject's inherent limits and the obiect's external scales.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249