土地行政绩效评价指标体系构建与应用——以无锡市为例  

A Land Administration Performance Evaluation Indicator System for Wuxi City

作　　者：姜海[1] 姚旻辰[1] 段修亭[1,2] 曲福田[1] 王博[1] 顾汉龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京农业大学中国土地问题研究中心,南京210095 [2]无锡市国土资源局,无锡214023

出　　处：《资源科学》2013年第3期545-553,共9页Resources Science

基　　金：江苏省国土资源科技项目(编号:201001);国家社科基金重大招标项目(编号:09&ZD046);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(编号:11JZD031)

摘　　要：建立常规性土地行政绩效考核体系,加强地方政府土地行为引导,是在现行土地行政体制下促进科学发展和土地公平、高效配置的重要途径。论文从土地资源管理、土地资产管理、支撑体系建设、部门内部管理4个方面出发,应用层次分析法和专家咨询法,构建了面向市、县的土地行政绩效评价指标体系,并以无锡市为例进行实证研究。研究结果表明:①2004年-2009年无锡市土地行政绩效改进明显,综合评价分值从68.73提高至88.47;②2004年-2009年无锡市土地行政绩效提升主要得益于土地资产管理水平改进,其贡献率高达57.2%;③2009年不同市(区)土地行政绩效差异主要体现在部门学习与创新能力、人力资源管理、土地养育功能管理、土地资产评估与地价管理、土地生态功能维护等方面。Local governments in China undertake a dual function of preservation of farmland and other natural resources and management of stated-owned urban land assets. Conflicts between the public and local governments seriously undermine the efficiency and efficacy of land administration leading to some socio-economic problems such as excessive loss of arable land and unfairness of land revenue distribution. However, local government behaviors are mainly restricted by higher governments. In order to improve the efficiency and equality of land resource allocation,a formal top-down performance evaluation system is urgently needed to orient local government land administration. Here, a land administration performance evaluation indicator system for local governments is constructed using theories of new public management, government performance management, and AHP and expert consultation. The indicator system is composed of four comprehensive criterions （land resource management, land asset management, support system development and internal management） and applied to Wuxi. We found that land administration performance valuation scores significantly increased from 68.73 in 2004 to 88.47 in 2009. Land administration performance improvement in Wuxi city was mainly regarding to the enhancement of staff quality, learning and innovation capacity of land administrative bureau, establishment of a social security system for landless peoples, decreasing illegal land use cases, development of land market mechanisms and land price regulation, and increasing constructed land use intensity. About 57.2% of land administration performance improvement came from the improvement of land asset management in Wuxi city. Land administration performance sharply vaned among different counties and districts in 2009, in terms of learning and innovation capacity, staff quality of land administrative bureau, effects of farmland preservation, land price regulation and the conservation of ecological function. Reasonable orientation and division of lo

关 键 词：土地行政 绩效评价 指标体系 无锡市 

分 类 号：F301[经济管理—产业经济]