检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学经济学院
出 处:《世界经济研究》2013年第3期53-58,88-89,共6页World Economy Studies
基 金:霍英东教育基金会资助项目"社会网络约束下的市场中介组织行为异化及其治理研究"(批准号121081);教育部新世纪人才支持项目(批准号NCET-08-0083);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"生产性服务业衍生企业进入的生产率效应及规制政策研究"(DUT12RW302)
摘 要:选取我国省级细分行业面板数据,利用存量调整模型,对服务业与制造业的对华FDI区位选择的差异进行了研究。结果表明:与经济发达国家不同,处于转轨阶段的中国制造业FDI存量调整到均衡水平的速度快于服务业;服务业和制造业跨国公司在中国投资时,服务业FDI看重市场规模和基础设施水平,受集聚因素的影响不显著,制造业则看重市场规模和劳动力成本,倾向于投资到产业集聚度高的地区。此外,由于政府优惠政策多向制造业倾斜,因而地方政府控制力越大越有利于吸引制造业FDI,而不利于吸引服务业FDI。Using China provincial sub-industry panel data,based on stock adjustment model,this paper analyses the differences in service and manufacturing industry of FDI location factors to China.The results showed that: In the transition stage of China which is different from developed countries,FDI in manufacturing industry adjusts much faster to its desired level than services FDI due to the excessive government interventions to economic;When multinational companies invest to China,services FDI value the market size and infrastructure is insignificantly affected by agglomeration,at the same,time FDI in manufacturing industry driven by market size and labor cost trends to invest in high industrial agglomeration region.In addition,since the government′s favorable policies are inclined to attract investment to manufacturing industry,the greater the control of local governments,the more conducive is to attracting FDI in manufacturing industry,and the less conducive is to absorbing FDI in service industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28