检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年第2期32-43,共12页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(09JZD0017)
摘 要:随着全球经济一体化的深入,任何一个投资目的地的风险中必然包含了全球的系统性风险因素。同时,地理或经济上联系紧密的国家(地区)还共同受区域系统性风险的影响。中国海外投资目的地的总体风险可分解为全球、区域系统性风险与非系统性风险。研究发现:总体风险方面,发达国家平均总风险显著低于其他地区;全球系统性风险方面,欧洲国家显著高于其他地区,开放度高的小型经济体国家受全球系统性风险影响较大;作为我国企业海外投资最主要目的地的亚洲和欧洲大部分国家受区域系统性风险影响较大,可适当增加对与亚洲发展中国家经济发展程度类似的南美国家的投资,分散区域系统性风险;非洲国家非系统性风险占比最高,而欧洲国家的非系统性风险较小。With the deepening of global economic integration, the relationships between the countries all over the world have become closer and the impact of systematic risk from the global market on individual countries goes up. Therefore, research on the risk of investment destination must involve an assessment of global systematic risk. At the same time, with the depth of regional integration, for example the use of a single currency and close cooperation among European countries, countries with close geographic or economic connections also share a common regional systematic risk. In the study of the risk of overseas investment, systematic risk must be distinguished from the idiosyncratic risk of the destination. The existing research on the overseas investment risk at the country level mainly focused on the analysis of "country risk. " Using a modified Akdogan international risk decomposition model, the overall risk of China's overseas investment is differentiated into global systematic risks, regional systematic risks, and unsystematic risks. The main findings are reviewed below. (1) The overall risk was significantly lower in Europe, North America, and Oceania than in other regions, owing to the relatively small economic fluctuations in those mature economies. By contrast, Asia and South America bore higher overall risk. The emerging countries and regions in these regions had higher economic fluctuations, which may explain the high overall risk. (2) The proportion of global systematic risk in the overall risk was significantly high in the developed countries of Europe, reflecting these countries close ties to global economic fluctuations. From the perspective of country-specific characteristics, small and open countries and areas were more vulnerable to the impact of global systematic risk. The United Kingdom, South Africa, and Luxembourg, where China had large investments, had particularly high proportions of global systematic risk. High attention should be paid to these countries. In addition, North
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.238.207