检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾引狮[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第3期85-93,共9页Law Science Magazine
基 金:国家社科基金项目"中国--东盟知识产权保护与合作的法律协调研究"(批准号:09XFX034)阶段性成果
摘 要:美国与东盟部分国家就TPP知识产权的谈判是一个典型的博弈过程。在众多成员国参与的动态博弈进程中,美国具有"决策人"的先行动优势。美国单方面提出了知识产权谈判草案,体现了其在商标、版权、专利、执法等方面的获益偏好。目前参与谈判的东盟部分国家的知识产权制度与美国草案相比,在各个方面都存在着不少的差距。如果美国的知识产权谈判草案得以通过,将对参与TPP谈判博弈的东盟国家的文化产业、地理标志产品、公共健康、植物新品种保护等方面产生不利影响;并可能会分化东盟内部知识产权的双边及多边合作,迟滞东盟知识产权一体化的进程。对于美国单方拟定的知识产权草案,美国国内存在着严重分歧,其他TPP谈判各方也是忧虑重重。可以预见,未来要想达到各方都能接受的知识产权保护标准,TPP谈判各方还需经历一个长期的变化和博弈过程。The negotiation of TPP intellectual property(IP) is a typical game process. In this multi- player dynamic game process, USA has advantage in the decision. During the negotia-tions, USA unilaterally drafted the IP chapter, which embody the USA's payoff preference in the trademark,copyright,patent,law enforcement and so on. compared with USA IP draft, parts of the ASEAN countries current IP system have many gap. If the USA IP negotiation draft adopted, there would be adverse effects on the some ASEAN countries cultural industry, product of geo-graphical indication, public health, the protection of new varieties of plants; and may differenti-ate ASEAN intellectual property of bilateral and multilateral cooperation, hysteresis ASEAN intel-lectual property integration process. Even the American domestic is existing serious differences on it, other TPP negotiators also worry about it. Oberviously, it will undergo a long process of not - zero game to achieve the IP protection standard which is acceptable to all negotiators.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

