论专利权有效性争议之可仲裁性  

On the Arbitrability of Patent Right Validity Disputes

作　　者：倪静[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院 [2]中国社会科学院法学所

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第3期37-41,47,共6页Intellectual Property

基　　金：作者主持的2010年度国家社科基金项目<知识产权争议多元化解决机制研究>(项目编号:10CFX037)阶段性成果;上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(2009年度;项目编号:hzf09010)成果

摘　　要：世界各国对待专利有效性争议可仲裁性的态度大相径庭。反对专利权有效性争议可仲裁性的公共政策理由包括专利来源于国家授权、存在审查专利效力的专门机构以及专利效力与公共利益密不可分等。但是,由于仲裁裁决仅对仲裁当事人发生法律效力,并不影响社会大众利益,也不涉及对公共政策的损害,因而,在专利仲裁过程中,如果一方当事人以专利无效提出抗辩,仲裁庭可以就专利效力进行审理,但是审理结果仅对仲裁当事人发生法律效力。The attitudes on the arbitrability of the patent validity disputes are very different all over the world. The objection excuse of public policy includes that patent right comes from the state authorization, only the exclusive organs is entitled to decide patent＇s validity and there is inextricable relation between the patent＇s validity and public interest. However, the arbitration verdict only takes legal effect on the two parties, and will not influence the public interest and harm the public policy. So in the arbitration process, if one party put in the plea of patent＇s invalidity, the arbitral tribunal should be entitled to make verdict on patent＇s validity which only binds the two parties.

关 键 词：专利有效性 争议 仲裁 可仲裁性 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学] D925.7[政治法律—法学]