中国部分医药卫生类高校学报的学术影响力分析  

Academic Impact Analysis of Some Medical and Health Science University Journals in China

作　　者：韩维栋[1] 胡爱玲[1] 李雪倩[2] 

机构地区：[1]<西安交通大学学报(医学版)>编辑部,西安710061 [2]西安交通大学医学院,西安710061

出　　处：《出版科学》2013年第2期64-70,共7页Publishing Journal

基　　金：2010年中国高校科技期刊研究会科技期刊研究基金资助项目"高校医药卫生类科技期刊的学术影响力与综合竞争力研究"(GBJXB1013)研究成果

摘　　要：以《中文核心期刊要目总览》(2008年版)中的24种医药卫生类高校学报为研究对象,以2006—2010年出版的《中国科技期刊引证报告》(核心版)数据为依据,采用学术影响力动态评估模型,对研究对象的学术影响力状况进行分析。结果显示,相对学术影响力评估分值(I_r)大于1的学报有5个,1—0.60的学报有8个,小于0.60的学报有11个。说明其中优秀学报的比例偏低,而且I_r之间相差非常悬殊。建议在办刊过程中,重视论文的学术质量、来源文献量、相关学科的高被引论文和提高基金论文比。We selected 24 comprehensive medical and health science journals listed in Chinese Core Journals （2008 edition） for the study. Based on the data of core version of China Science end Technology Journal Citation Reports published between 2006 and 2010 and using e dynamically assessing academic impact model, we analyzed the academic impact of the 24 journals. Results showed that five journals had the assessment score of the relative academic impact （h） above 1, eight journals had the score ranging from 1 to 0.60, and eleven journals had the score below 0.60. It indicated that the proportion of excellent journals was relatively small and that /r difference between the very poor and the highest-quality ones was very great. We suggest that journals should pay more attention to papers＇ academic quality, the amount of source documents, highly cited papers, and increasing the proportion of fund-supported papers.

关 键 词：学术影响力 相对学术影响力 评估分值 医药卫生 高校学报 

分 类 号：G236[文化科学]