检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中医学报》2013年第3期320-321,共2页Acta Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察归脾汤治疗肿瘤相关性贫血的疗效。方法:将62例肿瘤相关性贫血患者,随机分为治疗组31例和对照组31例。对照组口服速力菲胶囊及叶酸片,治疗组在对照组的基础上加用归脾汤(药物组成:黄芪12 g,白术9 g,茯神9 g,龙眼肉12 g,炒酸枣仁12 g,人参6 g,木香6 g,炙甘草3 g,当归9 g,远志6 g,生姜6 g,大枣3枚)。结果:治疗组在增高血红蛋白量、红细胞计数方面与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组有效率为93.5%,对照组有效率为48.4%,两组有效率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:归脾汤治疗肿瘤相关性贫血疗效肯定。Objective:To investigate the curative effect of guipi soup treatment of cancer related anemia. Methods:62 example patients of cancer related anemia were randomly selected 31 cases of treatment group and 31 cases of control group. The control group was treated with oral folic acid and ferrons succinate. The treatment group was additionally Guipi soup on the basis of the control group ( Composvtion: Huangqi 12 g,Baizhu 9 g,Fushen 9 g,Longyanrou 12 g,Chaosuanzaoren 12 g,Renshen 6 g,Muxiang 6 g,Zhigancao 3 g, Danggui 9 g, Yuanzhi 6 g, Shengjiang 6 g, Dazao 3 piece). Results:About comparative differences between the two groups was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05 ) in increase the amount of hemoglobin and the number of red blood cells ; treatment group: the effective rate was 93.5%, control group:the effective rate was 48.4% ,there are marked difference between the two groups in effective rate,and the two groups have stastistical significance (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion:Guipi soup has good efficacy in the treatment of cancer related anemia.
分 类 号:R273[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145