检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长春中医药大学护理学院,吉林长春130117
出 处:《吉林医学》2013年第7期1334-1336,共3页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察循证护理在恶性血液病化疗后恶心、呕吐患者中应用的临床护理效果。方法:将符合纳入标准的102例恶性血液病化疗后恶心、呕吐患者随机分为循证护理组51例和常规护理组51例,循证护理组采用循证护理;常规护理组采用常规护理。每个疗程结束后进行患者化疗后恶心、呕吐的发生率和总有效控制率的比较。结果:循证护理组患者化疗后恶心、呕吐的发生率为62.7%(32/51),总有效控制率为92.2%(47/51);常规护理组患者恶心、呕吐发生率为84.3%(43/51),总有效控制率为56.9%(29/51),结果证实循证护理组较常规护理组患者化疗后恶心、呕吐的发生率低、总有效控制率高。结论:循证护理在恶性血液病化疗后恶心、呕吐患者中的应用较常规护理更有效。Objective To observe evidence-based nursing in malignant diseases of the blood of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients with clinical nursing of application effect.Method 102 patients who met the cfiterra with malignant diseases of the blood of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy patients were randomly divided into evidence-based nursing group and conventional care group 51 cases ineach group,evidence-based nursing group used evidence-based nursing;Conventional care group used the routine care.After the end of each period of treatment for chemotherapy patients we companed the incidence of nausea,vomiting and total effective control.Results Evidence-based nursing after chemotherapy groups of patients,nausea,vomiting incidence was 62.7%(32/51),the total effective control rates was 92.2%(47/51);The routine care groups of patients,nausea,vomiting rate was 84.3%(43/51),the total effective control rates was 56.9%(29/51),the results confirmed the incidence of the nausea and vomiting of evidence-based nuring group was less than that of care group,the incidence of total effective control rates were higher in evidence-based nuring group.Conclusion evidence-based nursing in malignant diseases of the blood after chemotherapy in patients with nausea and vomiting was more effective than rontine care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222