体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表用于术后疼痛评估的比较  

Comparison of the evoked response electrical stimulator and visual analog scale for pain assessment in postoperative patients

作　　者：刘明娟[1] 姚明[1] 黄兵[1] 朱艳丽[2] 倪华栋[2] 过建国[1] 肖纯[1] 周煦燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]嘉兴学院附属第一医院麻醉与疼痛医学科,浙江省嘉兴市314001 [2]温州医学院附属第二医院麻醉科,325027

出　　处：《实用医学杂志》2013年第6期948-950,共3页The Journal of Practical Medicine

基　　金：浙江省卫生高层次创新人才培养工程项目(编号:2012-RC-22);浙江省中西医结合疼痛医学重点学科建设基金(编号:2012-XK-A31)

摘　　要：目的:通过体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表对术后患者急性疼痛评估的比较,探讨使用体感诱发电位刺激仪进行术后疼痛的评估的可行性。方法:观察美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ～Ⅱ级的手术后患者155例,年龄18～72岁,分别用体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表对术后患者的急性疼痛进行评估,用SPSS11.0软件对测得的数据进行统计学分析。结果:体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表的相关系数为0.635(P<0.001),两者存在显著正相关关系。结论:体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表有较好的相关性,体感诱发电位刺激仪可用于疼痛评估,有较好的临床应用前景。Objective To compare the validity of the evoked response electrical stimulator （ERES） with visual analog scale （VAS） in analyzing pain intensity in postoperative patients. Methods 155 patients with ASA Ⅰ- Ⅱ grade, aged 18-72 years, were followed-up within day 1-3 after surgery. The pain intensity evaluated by ERES and VAS in postoperative patients were recorded. Results There was a significant correlation between VAS and PD in the two groups, the respective coefficient of eorrelation was 0.635 （P 〈 0.001 ）. Conclusion There was a well eonelation between VAS and ERES in lhe pain assessment in postoperative patients. It is feasible for ERES to assess pain intensity in postoperative patients.

关 键 词：视觉模拟量表 体感诱发电位刺激仪 相关性 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]