检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]咸阳师范学院教育科学学院,中国712000 [2]陕西师范大学心理学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第4期628-629,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:咸阳师范学院专项科研基金(11XSYK334)资助
摘 要:目的探讨大学生自尊水平对其幸福感的直接效应,以及通过社会支持的中介作用所起产生的间接效应。方法以202名大学生为被试,用社会支持评定量表、缺陷感量表和牛津幸福感量表修订版进行问卷调查。结果①幸福感与自尊(r=0.57,P<0.001)和社会支持(r=0.56,P<0.001)均呈显著正相关;自尊与社会支持也呈显著正相关(r=0.35,P<0.001);②社会支持在自尊与幸福感之间的关系中起部分中介作用,其中介效应为β=0.28,P<0.01。结论自尊既能直接影响幸福感,也能通过社会支持的中介作用间接影响幸福感。Objective To explore the direct effect of self-esteem on welt-being, and the indirect effect through social support. Methods A total of 202 undergraduates were investigated by the Revised Oxford Happiness Scale,Feelings of Inadequacy Scale, and Social Support Rating Scale. Results ①Well-being was significantly positively correlated with self-esteem (r = 0. 57, P〈 0. 001)and social support (r=0. 56, P〈0. 001 ). Self-esteem was also significantly associated with social support (r = 0. 35, P〈 0. 001 ). ②Social support exerted a partial mediating effect on the relation between self-esteem and well-being (β= 0. 28 ,P〈0. 01 ). Conclusion Self-esteem can influence well-being directly and also exert a significantly positive indirect effect on well-being via so- cial support.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225