物流的定性及其法律适用与规范  

Qualification of Logistics and the Corresponding Operation and Regulation of Law

作　　者：蒋军洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《中国流通经济》2013年第3期107-114,共8页China Business and Market

基　　金：河南省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目"河南省促进现代物流发展的法律支持与保障研究"(项目编号:2011-QN-007)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：物流的发展脉络揭示了其复杂性的一面。由于物流是一种包含了多种内容的一体化给付,根据合同法所坚持的合同类型化立场,其法律含义不太容易明确。在学术界,物流合同被视为非典型合同,在商事实践中尚未形成固化的模式,在司法实践中尚未形成具有司法实践指导意义的法律适用规则,其法律适用的合适通道只能是法律类推。在这种思想路线指导下,物流合同适用的是承揽规范。为更好地维护当事人利益,避免法官解决纷争时考虑适用典型合同规则,当事人应将物流合同细化。物流除具有服务性外,还具有营业性。由于物流营业涉及公共利益、公共安全,市场准入成为政府的管制通道;由于物流本质上是一项服务,需要审慎思考法律控制管制的度。The development of logistics reveals its physiognomy of complexity. The presence of such contract having integrated and multiply prestation as its content rends uncertain legal placement in the form of typical contracts of Contract Law. In the academic world, logistics contract is considered to be atypia contract; because of the lack of consolidated model in the commercial practice and the lack of rules having guidance importance in the juridical practice, the only proper path of the operation of law is legal analogy. According to such line of thinking, the logistics contract should be regulated by the rules of work contract. Certainly, the more pertinent suggestion for the contracting parties is to refine their contract to protect their interests much better and to avoid the application of the rules of typical contracts in the course of settling of the disputes by the judges. Besides the nature of providing services, logistics is doing business. Because such business regards to public interests and public safety, market access comes to be the regulation path of the government. But because the essential of logistics is providing services, it needs to be considered cautiously how to control the dimension of the government regulation.

关 键 词：物流 定性 法律适用 法律规范 

分 类 号：F250[经济管理—国民经济]