检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2013年第5期670-671,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的探讨循证护理在预防气管切开患者术后并发症的临床效果。方法将72例接受气管切开手术治疗的患者分为对照组和观察组,各36例,对照组实施传统护理,观察组实施循证护理,比较两组护理实施效果。结果观察组呼吸道阻塞、黏膜损伤发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组肺部感染时间和切开置管时间也短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论气管切开术后实施循证护理可显著降低并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。Objective To observe the clinical effects of evidence-based nursing in the prevention of complications after tracheotomy. Methods 72 patients with tracheotomy were selected and divided into two groups equally. The control group was performed the convention nursing and the observation group adopted the evidence-based nursing. The effects were compared be- tween the two groups. Results The incidence rates of airway obstruction and respiratory tract mucosa damage in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P〈0.05). The lung infection time and indwelling catheter time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Conducting the evidence-based nursing after tracheoto- my can reduce the complication occurence significantly, which is worth for generalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229